lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBR5nCfn756Wb8xQEb9Xse+UQPAbGy969cP4sxO78-Nq4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:47:25 -0800
From:   Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] perf core: Add PERF_COUNT_SW_CGROUP_SWITCHES event

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:28 AM Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > +     prev_cgrp = task_css_check(prev, perf_event_cgrp_id, 1)->cgroup;
> > +     next_cgrp = task_css_check(next, perf_event_cgrp_id, 1)->cgroup;
> > +
> > +     if (prev_cgrp != next_cgrp)
> > +             perf_sw_event_sched(PERF_COUNT_SW_CGROUP_SWITCHES, 1, 0);
>
> Seems to be the perf cgroup only, not all cgroups.
> That's a big difference and needs to be documented properly.
>
We care about the all-cgroup case.

> Probably would make sense to have two events for both, one for
> all cgroups and one for perf only.
>
>
>
> -Andi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ