linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net v2] bonding: fix feature flag setting at init time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:17:26 -0800
From:   Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
To:     Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
        Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Davis <tadavis@....gov>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] bonding: fix feature flag setting at init time

Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com> wrote:

>On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:55 PM Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com> wrote:
>>
>> Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Don't try to adjust XFRM support flags if the bond device isn't yet
>> >registered. Bad things can currently happen when netdev_change_features()
>> >is called without having wanted_features fully filled in yet. Basically,
>> >this code was racing against register_netdevice() filling in
>> >wanted_features, and when it got there first, the empty wanted_features
>> >led to features also getting emptied out, which was definitely not the
>> >intended behavior, so prevent that from happening.
>>
>>         Is this an actual race?  Reading Ivan's prior message, it sounds
>> like it's an ordering problem (in that bond_newlink calls
>> register_netdevice after bond_changelink).
>
>Sorry, yeah, this is not actually a race condition, just an ordering
>issue, bond_check_params() gets called at init time, which leads to
>bond_option_mode_set() being called, and does so prior to
>bond_create() running, which is where we actually call
>register_netdevice().

	So this only happens if there's a "mode" module parameter?  That
doesn't sound like the call path that Ivan described (coming in via
bond_newlink).

	-J

>>         The change to bond_option_mode_set tests against reg_state, so
>> presumably it wants to skip the first(?) time through, before the
>> register_netdevice call; is that right?
>
>Correct. Later on, when the bonding driver is already loaded, and
>parameter changes are made, bond_option_mode_set() gets called and if
>the mode changes to or from active-backup, we do need/want this code
>to run to update wanted and features flags properly.
>
>
>-- 
>Jarod Wilson
>jarod@...hat.com

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com