[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201202230303.GO5487@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 19:03:03 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: adapt allowed RTC update error
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 11:08:38PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c: x86_platform.set_wallclock = kvm_set_wallclock;
> > arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c: x86_platform.set_wallclock = set_rtc_noop;
> > arch/x86/xen/time.c: x86_platform.set_wallclock = xen_set_wallclock;
> > arch/x86/xen/time.c: x86_platform.set_wallclock = xen_set_wallclock;
> > All returns -ENODEV/EINVAL
>
> You forgot to stare at the .get_wallclock() functions. That's the more
> interesting part, i.e. what's behind read_persistent_clock64().
Small steps! I was only looking at deleting the legacy
CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE from x86 which only controls the
update_persistent_clock64()
Yes, there is a similar redundancy with rtclib on the
read_persistant_clock side, and that does looks much further..
> > arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c: .set_wallclock = mach_set_rtc_mmss,
> > This is already rtclib under drivers/rtc/rtc-mc146818-lib.c
>
> That's the shared library function for setting the darn thing.
Yes, but if a PNP entry is present then rtc-cmos will load and call
that function through the rtclib path instead of the
update_persistent_clock64() path
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists