[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X8gjliMAsPYZFrU1@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:30:30 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@...iatek.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, dsahern@...nel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, liuhangbin@...il.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: mmap_lock: fix use-after-free race and css ref leak
in tracepoints
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 03:23:57PM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > There've been some changes to cgroup ids recently and now cgroup id, ino and
> > its file_handle are all compatible. On 64bit ino machines, they're all the
> > same and won't be reused. On 32bit ino machines, the lower 32bit of full id
> > is used as ino. ino may be reused but not the full 64bit id.
>
> __kernfs_new_node() is using idr_alloc_cyclic() which will return
> 32bit ID. If I am understanding this correctly the full ID is
> generated similarly for 32bit and 64bit machines but for 64bit
> machines the whole ID is inode number while on 32bit machines the
> lower 32bits contains the inode number. Is that correct?
Yes, that's correct.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists