[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201202154736.5799e01b4c27a75b98e863fc@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 15:47:36 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: refactor initialization of stuct page for holes in
memory layout
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:15:02 +0200 Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> There could be struct pages that are not backed by actual physical memory.
> This can happen when the actual memory bank is not a multiple of
> SECTION_SIZE or when an architecture does not register memory holes
> reserved by the firmware as memblock.memory.
>
> Such pages are currently initialized using init_unavailable_mem() function
> that iterated through PFNs in holes in memblock.memory and if there is a
> struct page corresponding to a PFN, the fields if this page are set to
> default values and it is marked as Reserved.
>
> init_unavailable_mem() does not take into account zone and node the page
> belongs to and sets both zone and node links in struct page to zero.
>
> On a system that has firmware reserved holes in a zone above ZONE_DMA, for
> instance in a configuration below:
>
> # grep -A1 E820 /proc/iomem
> 7a17b000-7a216fff : Unknown E820 type
> 7a217000-7bffffff : System RAM
>
> unset zone link in struct page will trigger
>
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!zone_spans_pfn(page_zone(page), pfn), page);
That sounds pretty serious.
> because there are pages in both ZONE_DMA32 and ZONE_DMA (unset zone link in
> struct page) in the same pageblock.
>
> Interleave initialization of pages that correspond to holes with the
> initialization of memory map, so that zone and node information will be
> properly set on such pages.
>
Should this be backported to -stable? If so, do we have a suitable Fixes:?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists