linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/22] keembay-ipc: Add Keem Bay IPC module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <X8cxNA3GTi/LrTt/@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 07:16:20 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     markgross@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, bp@...e.de,
        damien.lemoal@....com, dragan.cvetic@...inx.com, corbet@....net,
        leonard.crestez@....com, palmerdabbelt@...gle.com,
        paul.walmsley@...ive.com, peng.fan@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        shawnguo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniele Alessandrelli <daniele.alessandrelli@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/22] keembay-ipc: Add Keem Bay IPC module

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 02:34:52PM -0800, mgross@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -8955,6 +8955,14 @@ M:	Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...xity.net>
>  S:	Maintained
>  F:	drivers/char/hw_random/ixp4xx-rng.c
>  
> +INTEL KEEM BAY IPC DRIVER
> +M:	Daniele Alessandrelli <daniele.alessandrelli@...el.com>
> +M:	Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>
> +S:	Maintained
> +F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/intel/intel,keembay-ipc.yaml
> +F:	drivers/soc/intel/keembay-ipc.c
> +F:	include/linux/soc/intel/keembay-ipc.h

Sad that Intel is not going to actually pay you all to do this
maintenance work for a brand new subsystem you are wanting to add to the
tree :(

Does this mean you all will have to do it on your own time and not as
part of your work at Intel?  If so, why not just use your personal email
addresses instead to make it a bit more obvious?

thanks,

greg k-h