[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201202080211.GD3021@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:02:11 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greg Kerr <kerrnel@...gle.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, vineeth@...byteword.org,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Agata Gruza <agata.gruza@...el.com>,
Antonio Gomez Iglesias <antonio.gomez.iglesias@...el.com>,
graf@...zon.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, dfaggioli@...e.com,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Patrick Bellasi <derkling@...gle.com>, benbjiang@...cent.com,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, OWeisse@...ch.edu,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...cle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>, chris.hyser@...cle.com,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
Oleg Rombakh <olegrom@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 26/32] sched: Add a second-level tag for nested
CGroup usecase
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:18:00PM -0800, Josh Don wrote:
> Hey Peter,
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 5:43 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Why can't the above work by setting 'tag' (that's a terrible name, why
> > does that still live) in CDE? Have the most specific tag live. Same with
> > that thread stuff.
>
> The motivation is to allow an unprivileged user the ability to
> configure the trust hierarchy in a way that otherwise wouldn't be
> possible for a given cgroup hierarchy. For example given a cookie'd
> hierarchy such as:
>
> A
> / | | \
> B C D E
>
> the user might only want subsets of {B, C, D, E} to share. For
> instance, the user might only want {B,C} and {D, E} to share. One way
> to solve this would be to allow the user to write the group cookie
> directly. However, this interface would need to be restricted to
> privileged users, since otherwise the cookie could be configured to
> share with any arbitrary cgroup. The purpose of the 'color' field is
> to expose a portion of the cookie that can be modified by a
> non-privileged user in order to achieve this sharing goal.
>
> If this doesn't seem like a useful case, I'm happy to drop this patch
> from the series to unblock it.
Well, the traditional cgroup way of doing that would be to:
A
/ \
T1 T2
/ \
B C
And tag T1 if you want B,C to share.
So me the color thing reads like an end-run around the cgroup hierarchy.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists