[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <160689907597.3084105.18019089399087866918.stgit@devnote2>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:51:16 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] x86/uprobes: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes
Since the insn.prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than the size of
insn.prefixes.bytes[] when a same prefix is repeated, we have to
check whether the insn.prefixes.bytes[i] != 0 and i < 4 instead
of insn.prefixes.nbytes.
Fixes: 2b1444983508 ("uprobes, mm, x86: Add the ability to install and remove uprobes breakpoints")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 3fdaa042823d..bb3ea3705b99 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static bool is_prefix_bad(struct insn *insn)
{
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; insn->prefixes.bytes[i] && i < 4; i++) {
insn_attr_t attr;
attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(insn->prefixes.bytes[i]);
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static int branch_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
* Intel and AMD behavior differ in 64-bit mode: Intel ignores 66 prefix.
* No one uses these insns, reject any branch insns with such prefix.
*/
- for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; insn->prefixes.bytes[i] && i < 4; i++) {
if (insn->prefixes.bytes[i] == 0x66)
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists