lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed,  2 Dec 2020 17:51:16 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] x86/uprobes: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes

Since the insn.prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than the size of
insn.prefixes.bytes[] when a same prefix is repeated, we have to
check whether the insn.prefixes.bytes[i] != 0 and i < 4 instead
of insn.prefixes.nbytes.

Fixes: 2b1444983508 ("uprobes, mm, x86: Add the ability to install and remove uprobes breakpoints")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 3fdaa042823d..bb3ea3705b99 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static bool is_prefix_bad(struct insn *insn)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; insn->prefixes.bytes[i] && i < 4; i++) {
 		insn_attr_t attr;
 
 		attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(insn->prefixes.bytes[i]);
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static int branch_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
 	 * Intel and AMD behavior differ in 64-bit mode: Intel ignores 66 prefix.
 	 * No one uses these insns, reject any branch insns with such prefix.
 	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; insn->prefixes.bytes[i] && i < 4; i++) {
 		if (insn->prefixes.bytes[i] == 0x66)
 			return -ENOTSUPP;
 	}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ