linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] s390: cio: fix use-after-free in ccw_device_destroy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 10:30:52 +0100
From:   Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: cio: fix use-after-free in
 ccw_device_destroy_console

Thank you.With a very minor modification in the commit-message,

Reviewed-by: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@...ux.ibm.com>

I will push this and Vasliy/Heiko will take this up for the next 
s390-tree upstream-release.


On 12/1/20 7:31 AM, Qinglang Miao wrote:
> put_device calls release function which do kfree() inside.
> So following use of sch&cdev would cause use-after-free bugs.
>
> Fix these by simply adjusting the position of put_device.

Modified the commit-message as below. Just for the clarification.

--

Use of sch->dev reference after the put_device() call could trigger
the use-after-free bugs.

Fix this by simply adjusting the position of put_device.
--
>
> Fixes: 37db8985b211 ("s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>
> ---
>   This patch is indeed a v2 of older one. Considering that the
>   patch's name has changed, I think a normal prefix 'PATCH' is
>   better.
>
>   drivers/s390/cio/device.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/device.c b/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
> index b29fe8d50..33280ca18 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
> @@ -1664,10 +1664,10 @@ void __init ccw_device_destroy_console(struct ccw_device *cdev)
>   	struct io_subchannel_private *io_priv = to_io_private(sch);
>   
>   	set_io_private(sch, NULL);
> -	put_device(&sch->dev);
> -	put_device(&cdev->dev);
>   	dma_free_coherent(&sch->dev, sizeof(*io_priv->dma_area),
>   			  io_priv->dma_area, io_priv->dma_area_dma);
> +	put_device(&sch->dev);
> +	put_device(&cdev->dev);
>   	kfree(io_priv);
>   }
>