linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: remove trailing semicolon in macro definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d83d3fe4-5999-b8d4-2b52-961313662e46@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 13:13:17 +0100
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     trix@...hat.com, ibm-acpi@....eng.br, mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: remove trailing semicolon in
 macro definition

Hi,

On 11/27/20 7:10 PM, trix@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> 
> The macro use will already have a semicolon.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>

Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans 
branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans

Note it will show up in my review-hans branch once I've pushed my
local branch there, which might take a while.

Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
merge-window.

Regards,

Hans

> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> index 36d9594bca7f..5bbb378d1a37 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c
> @@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ static struct attribute_set *create_attr_set(unsigned int max_members,
>  }
>  
>  #define destroy_attr_set(_set) \
> -	kfree(_set);
> +	kfree(_set)
>  
>  /* not multi-threaded safe, use it in a single thread per set */
>  static int add_to_attr_set(struct attribute_set *s, struct attribute *attr)
>