[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzY1Q7XZVMheN-e78HCO=M74frFM1d6h56-ChTNrDhNMUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:38:17 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: 彭浩(Richard) <richard.peng@...o.com>
Cc: "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/bpf: Return the appropriate error value
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 7:06 PM 彭浩(Richard) <richard.peng@...o.com> wrote:
>
> Compile times error:
> "Error: failed to load BTF from /mnt/linux/vmlinux: No such file or directory".
> This file "/mnt/linux/vmlinux" actually exists, but only because CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
> is not configured with this error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <richard.peng@...o.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> index 231b07203e3d..228f508fbd04 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ struct btf *btf__parse_elf(const char *path, struct btf_ext **btf_ext)
> err = 0;
>
> if (!btf_data) {
> - err = -ENOENT;
> + err = -EPROTO;
ENOENT as related to "no .BTF section found"... EPROTO would make
sense as well, but I don't think we need to really change anything.
"Protocol error" isn't very meaningful either...
> goto done;
> }
> btf = btf__new(btf_data->d_buf, btf_data->d_size);
> --
> 2.18.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists