linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 2/2] Kconfig updates for v5.10-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQGHjLYteCt+8BXSY-5CB0gaO1JtHY-SpPFrfdchoHKrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 21:53:20 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 2/2] Kconfig updates for v5.10-rc1

Hi Linus,

On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 3:28 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 11:05 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > As for the cc1plus cost, I got a similar result.
> >
> > Running scripts/gcc-plugin.sh directly
> > took me 0.5 sec, which is a fourth
> > of the allmodconfig run-time.
> >
> > Actually, I did not know this shell script
> > was so expensive to run...
>
> So it turns out that one reason it's so expensive to run is that it
> does a *lot* more than it claims to do.
>
> It says "we need a c++ compiler that supports the designated
> initializer GNU extension", but then it actually includes a header
> file from hell, rather than just test designated initializers.
>
> This patch makes the cc1plus overhead go down a lot. That said, I'm
> doubtful we really want gcc plugins at all, considering that the only
> real users have all apparently migrated to clang builtin functionality
> instead.
>
>         Linus


The attached patch looks OK to me.

Just a nit:
Now that the test code does not include any header,
you can also delete
"-I $srctree/gcc-plugins -I $gccplugins_dir/include"


If you apply it directly, please feel free to add

Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada