linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Use random MAC for the vdpa net instance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eaaa5fb6-fd6a-200f-8457-d27f758f1c64@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 21:33:19 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>, Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Use random MAC for the vdpa net instance


On 2020/12/2 下午9:07, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> Two questions here:
>>>> 1. Now we don't have support for control virtqueue. Yet, we must filter
>>>> packets based on MAC, what do you suggest to do here?
>>> How about an ioctl to pass the mac to the device?
>>> Maybe mirroring the control vq struct format ...
>> I think we'd better avoid such ad-hoc ioctls to make vhost-vDPA type
>> independent.
> Fundamentally this is about handling some VQs in QEMU, right?
> Maybe a generic ioctl along the lines of "CTRL_VQ" passing
> vq number and a command buffer from guest?
> Seems generic enough for you?
>

It looks to me you want to invent a synchronized API (or vDPA config 
ops) for submitting virtio descriptors.

Several issues I can think for this:

1) control vq allows the request to be handled asynchronously
2) we still need a way to isolate the DMA if there's a hardware 
virtqueue for the device that use DMA
3) new vDPA config operations need to be invented, new uAPI for 
vhost-vDPA, new virtio config ops for virtio-vDPA

It looks to me we can overcome 1) and 2) if we just stick to a virtqueue 
interface in vhost-vDPA as I proposed in [1]. For issue 3) it also 
requires much less work.

Thanks

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/23/1243