[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201202133716.GA22763@andrea>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 14:37:16 +0100
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
"K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Juan Vazquez <juvazq@...rosoft.com>,
Saruhan Karademir <skarade@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Avoid double fetch of msgtype
in vmbus_on_msg_dpc()
> > @@ -1072,12 +1073,19 @@ void vmbus_on_msg_dpc(unsigned long data)
> > /* no msg */
> > return;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * The hv_message object is in memory shared with the host. The host
> > + * could erroneously or maliciously modify such object. Make sure to
> > + * validate its fields and avoid double fetches whenever feasible.
> > + */
> > +
> > hdr = (struct vmbus_channel_message_header *)msg->u.payload;
> > + msgtype = hdr->msgtype;
>
> Should READ_ONCE be used here?
I think it should. Thank you for pointing this out.
Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists