lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53805573-fa3e-21af-4df8-82a5b8cc7beb@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:18:56 +0300
From:   Alexei Budankov <abudankov@...wei.com>
To:     "Bayduraev, Alexey V" <alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Petr Malat <oss@...at.biz>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, <abudankov@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Revert "perf session: Fix decompression of
 PERF_RECORD_COMPRESSED records"


Hi Alexey. Please see below.

On 02.12.2020 17:04, Bayduraev, Alexey V wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was able to reproduce "Couldn't allocate memory for decompression" on 32-bit 
> perf with long perf.data.
> 
> On my side mmap() in perf_session__process_compressed_event() fails with ENOMEM,
> due to exceeded memory limit for 32-bit applications.
> This happens with or without Petr's patch.
> 
> As I can see, these mappings are only released in perf_session__delete().
> We should think how to release them early.
> 
> On 02.12.2020 0:28, Alexei Budankov wrote:
>>
>> Eventually sending to the proper Alexey's address.
>>
>> On 02.12.2020 0:04, Alexei Budankov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01.12.2020 22:09, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:40:20PM +0100, Petr Malat wrote:
>>>>> Hi Jiří,
>>>>> were you able to reproduce the issue? I may also upload perf-archive
>>>>> if that would help.
>>>>
>>>> oh yea ;-) seems like those 2 commits you reverted broke 32 bits
>>>> perf for data files > 32MB
>>>>
>>>> but the fix you did does not work for Alexey's test he mentioned
>>>> in the commit:
>>>>
>>>>       $ perf record -z -- some_long_running_workload
>>>>       $ perf report --stdio -vv
>>>>
>>>> it's failing for me with:
>>>>
>>>> 	# ./perf report
>>>> 	Couldn't allocate memory for decompression
>>>> 	0xfe6f3a [0x60]: failed to process type: 81 [Operation not permitted]
>>>> 	Error:
>>>> 	failed to process sample
>>>> 	# To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
>>>> 	#
>>>>
>>>> I think that's why here's special handling for compressed
>>>> events, but I'll need to check on that in more detail,
>>>> I was hoping for Alexey to answer ;-)
>>>
>>> Sorry for delay. Alexey Bayduraev could possibly help with that sooner.
>>> Alexey, could you please follow up.

Next time please avoid top posting and reply in line.
For this specific case it is right here just below my
previous answer.

Thanks,
Alexei

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ