linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] edac: Supporting AST2400 and AST2600 edac driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <b6dd3a91-abe7-4e9d-b801-6e54e4c88827@www.fastmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 03 Dec 2020 01:32:44 +1030
From:   "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@...id.au>
To:     "Troy Lee" <troy_lee@...eedtech.com>,
        "Joel Stanley" <joel@....id.au>
Cc:     "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "Ryan Chen" <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
        "James Morse" <james.morse@....com>,
        "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT" 
        <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Robert Richter" <rrichter@...vell.com>,
        "leetroy@...il.com" <leetroy@...il.com>,
        "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Stefan M Schaeckeler" <sschaeck@...co.com>,
        "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:EDAC-CORE" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] edac: Supporting AST2400 and AST2600 edac driver



On Wed, 2 Dec 2020, at 19:11, Troy Lee wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion, I'll fix the review and create an new patch 
> against 
> latest Linux branch. Those exported function will be referenced in 
> other driver yet 
> to be upstream, so should I move those exported functions out of this 
> patch?
> 

Yes, let's leave the exports out of this patch, and add them in when you send 
the patch that depends on them.

Andrew