[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2436656.VLTSFkEMrK@n95hx1g2>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:20:36 +0100
From: Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
CC: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt.kanzenbach@...utronix.de>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@...enta.de>,
Paul Barker <pbarker@...sulko.com>,
"Codrin Ciubotariu" <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 9/9] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: add periodic output support
On Thursday, 3 December 2020, 16:52:46 CET, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 17:36, Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de> wrote:
> > Should ptp_sysfs be extended with a "pulse" attribute with calls
> > enable() with only PTP_PEROUT_DUTY_CYCLE set?
>
> Use tools/testing/selftests/ptp/testptp.
Thanks for the hint. Last time I looked at it (5.4), it used to have
no "pulse" feature (as the ioctl() interface).
Maybe I should also add support for PTP_PEROUT_PHASE to the KSZ driver.
regards
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists