[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201203165420.GL3059@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:54:20 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/uprobes: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for
loop over prefixes.bytes
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:45:48AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Since this is based on the array size, can
>
> idx < NUM_LEGACY_PREFIXES
>
> be replaced with:
>
> idx < ARRAY_SIZE(insn->prefixes.bytes)
Actually, this needs another change:
struct insn_field {
union {
insn_value_t value;
insn_byte_t bytes[NUM_LEGACY_PREFIXES];
because you can have max. 4 legacy prefixes and then we can do either of
the checks above.
Mine is shorter tho. :-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists