[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201203180838.GA25196@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 19:08:39 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, ira.weiny@...el.com,
fstests@...r.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] common/rc: Fix _check_s_dax()
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 11:55:50AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> *nod* and my suggestion was to explicitly test for the old/wrong value and
> offer the test-runner a hint about why it may have been set (missing the
> fix commit), but we should still ultimately fail the test when it is seen.
Yes, that's what I'd prefer.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists