[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbEfPScq_qMVJkDxfWBh-oRhY5phFr=517pam80YcpgMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:01:27 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/14] bpf: Pull tools/build/feature biz into
selftests Makefile
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 8:07 AM Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> This is somewhat cargo-culted from the libbpf build. It will be used
> in a subsequent patch to query for Clang BPF atomics support.
>
> Change-Id: I9318a1702170eb752acced35acbb33f45126c44c
Haven't seen this before. What's this Change-Id business?
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
All this just to detect the support for clang atomics?... Let's not
pull in the entire feature-detection framework unnecessarily,
selftests Makefile is complicated enough without that.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists