[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b287f185d554b5a87b82ea8ca79cb5a2@walle.cc>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 23:35:02 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@...ux.net>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: gpio: add virtio-gpio guest driver
Am 2020-12-03 20:00, schrieb Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult:
> On 02.12.20 15:15, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> + bufwalk = name_buffer;
>>> +
>>> + while (idx < priv->num_gpios &&
>>> + bufwalk < (name_buffer+cf.names_size)) {
>>> + gpio_names[idx] = (strlen(bufwalk) ? bufwalk
>>> : NULL);
>>> + bufwalk += strlen(bufwalk)+1;
>>> + idx++;
>>
>>
>> Something's wrong with indentation here.
>
> i dont think so: the "bufwalk ..." line belongs to the while expression
> and is right under the "idx", as it should be. I didn't want to break
> up
> at the "<" operator. shall i do this instead ?
Or don't break the lines at all. Both lines don't add up to more than
100 chars,
right?
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists