lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:43:48 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the f2fs tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in:

  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
  fs/f2fs/super.c

between commit:

  5c0602188dc7 ("f2fs: fix kbytes written stat for multi-device case")

from the f2fs tree and commits:

  8446fe9255be ("block: switch partition lookup to use struct block_device")
  9499ffc75217 ("f2fs: remove a few bd_part checks")

from the block tree.

I fixed it up (I think, see below, fs/f2fs/f2fs.h and fs/f2fs/super.c
used the versions from the f2fs tree) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
index 14ba1519639e,54a1905af052..000000000000
--- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
@@@ -1385,27 -1385,6 +1385,26 @@@ static void commit_checkpoint(struct f2
  	f2fs_submit_merged_write(sbi, META_FLUSH);
  }
  
 +static inline u64 get_sectors_written(struct block_device *bdev)
 +{
- 	return bdev->bd_part ?
- 		(u64)part_stat_read(bdev->bd_part, sectors[STAT_WRITE]) : 0;
++	return (u64)part_stat_read(bdev, sectors[STAT_WRITE]) : 0;
 +}
 +
 +u64 f2fs_get_sectors_written(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 +{
 +	if (f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi)) {
 +		u64 sectors = 0;
 +		int i;
 +
 +		for (i = 0; i < sbi->s_ndevs; i++)
 +			sectors += get_sectors_written(FDEV(i).bdev);
 +
 +		return sectors;
 +	}
 +
 +	return get_sectors_written(sbi->sb->s_bdev);
 +}
 +
  static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
  {
  	struct f2fs_checkpoint *ckpt = F2FS_CKPT(sbi);
diff --cc fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 5cd1b9f7cc53,49681a8d2b14..000000000000
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
diff --cc fs/f2fs/super.c
index 47858e0c5e95,af9f449da64b..000000000000
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ