linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kunit: tool: fix unit test cleanup handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 21:15:35 -0800
From:   Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kunit: tool: fix unit test cleanup handling

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 7:05 PM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:09 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > * Stop leaking file objects.
> > * Use self.addCleanup() to ensure we call cleanup functions even if
> > setUp() fails.
> > * use mock.patch.stopall instead of more error-prone manual approach
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> > ---
>
> This patch hasn't changed since v1, right?
>
> It's still:
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

Oops, yes. It's entirely unchanged.

The only change to the entire series was a rebase + drop the second
patch in favor of revamping the test_data_path() one.

>
> Cheers,
> -- David