[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201203064157.GF28939@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 14:41:57 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Al Grant <al.grant@....com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/perf: Enable PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR with SPE
Looping in Mathieu at this time.
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 02:39:41PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> [ + Mathieu ]
>
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 11:09:36PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:10:40PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 04:46:51PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 06:24:54PM +0200, James Clark wrote:
> > > > > Enable PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR by default when Arm SPE is enabled.
> > > > > This flag is required to get PID data in the SPE trace. Without
> > > > > it the perf tool will report 0 for PID which isn't very useful,
> > > > > especially when doing system wide profiling or profiling
> > > > > applications that fork.
> > > >
> > > > Can perf not figure out the pid some other way? (e.g. by tracing context
> > > > switches and correlating that with the SPE data?).
> > >
> > > For perf 'per-thread' mode, we can use context switch trace event as
> > > assisted info to select thread context. But for "system wide" mode and
> > > "snapshot" mode in perf tool, since the trace data is continuous, I
> > > think we cannot use context switch trace event to correlate the SPE
> > > trace data.
> >
> > Is there no way to correlate them with something like CNTVCT?
>
> Good point. Yes, we can convert CNTVCT to system time; I read the
> code in the perf's intel-pt.c and found the timestamp is used to
> correlate the auxtrace heap. I think it's better to dig more for
> detailed implementation.
>
> > > > Also, how does this work with pid namespaces?
> > >
> > > Here we are studying the implemetation of Intel-PT and Arm CoreSight.
> > >
> > > The context ID is stored into the hardware trace data when record;
> > > afterwards when perf tool decodes the trace data and detects the
> > > packet for context ID, it will select the machine's thread context in
> > > perf [1]. Since the perf tool gathers all the threads infomation in
> > > perf data file, based on the context ID, it can find the corresponding
> > > thread pointer with function machine__find_thread() [2].
> > >
> > > Since your question is for "pid namespace", to be honest, I don't know
> > > how perf tool to handle any confliction for differrent processes share
> > > the same PID, and I am not sure if you are asking CGroup related stuff
> > > or not. If this cannot answer your question, please let me know.
> >
> > My point was that the pid value written to CONTEXTIDR is a global pid
> > and does not take namespacing into account. If perf is run inside a pid
> > namespace, it will therefore not work.
>
> Understand now.
>
> The perf events PERF_RECORD_ITRACE_START/PERF_RECORD_SWITCH/
> PERF_RECORD_SWITCH_CPU_WIDE can be used to set pid/tid in perf. So this
> would be a safe way for perf tool running in pid namespace.
>
> Loop in Mathieu, this is a common issue for both Arm SPE and CoreSight
> (IIRC, though CoreSight's timestamp is not strictly attaching to Arm arch
> timer counter, the trend is to unify this for using arch timer
> counter).
>
> I think James could continue to upstream a new patch by following your
> suggestion for enabling PID_IN_CONTEXTIDR, eventually, it's a feature
> for Arm SPE to record CONTEXTIDR in its packet.
>
> Your questions inspired me, thanks!
>
> Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists