| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgmgmjmkUOOSDYaV3WG1GPzCzxbPG88qOXYXri1HNYW_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 10:05:44 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] perf core: Add PERF_COUNT_SW_CGROUP_SWITCHES event
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:19 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 12:02:04AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_PERF
> > +static inline void
> > +perf_sw_event_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
> > +{
> > + struct cgroup *prev_cgrp, *next_cgrp;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > +
> > + prev_cgrp = task_css_check(prev, perf_event_cgrp_id, 1)->cgroup;
> > + next_cgrp = task_css_check(next, perf_event_cgrp_id, 1)->cgroup;
> > +
> > + if (prev_cgrp != next_cgrp)
> > + perf_sw_event_sched(PERF_COUNT_SW_CGROUP_SWITCHES, 1, 0);
> > +
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static inline void perf_sw_event_cgroup_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
> > + struct task_struct *next) {}
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_PERF */
> > +
> > extern struct static_key_false perf_sched_events;
> >
> > static __always_inline bool
> > @@ -1220,6 +1241,7 @@ static inline void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
> > struct task_struct *next)
> > {
> > perf_sw_event_sched(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES, 1, 0);
> > + perf_sw_event_cgroup_switch(prev, next);
> >
> > if (static_branch_unlikely(&perf_sched_events))
> > __perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
>
> Urgh.. that's horrible, try something like this.
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 9a38f579bc76..5eb284819ee5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -1174,25 +1174,19 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs, __perf_regs[4]);
> * which is guaranteed by us not actually scheduling inside other swevents
> * because those disable preemption.
> */
> -static __always_inline void
> -perf_sw_event_sched(u32 event_id, u64 nr, u64 addr)
> +static __always_inline void __perf_sw_event_sched(u32 event_id, u64 nr, u64 addr)
> {
> - if (static_key_false(&perf_swevent_enabled[event_id])) {
> - struct pt_regs *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&__perf_regs[0]);
> + struct pt_regs *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&__perf_regs[0]);
>
> - perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
> - ___perf_sw_event(event_id, nr, regs, addr);
> - }
> + perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
> + ___perf_sw_event(event_id, nr, regs, addr);
> }
>
> extern struct static_key_false perf_sched_events;
>
> -static __always_inline bool
> -perf_sw_migrate_enabled(void)
> +static __always_inline bool __perf_sw_enabled(int swevt)
> {
> - if (static_key_false(&perf_swevent_enabled[PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS]))
> - return true;
> - return false;
> + return static_key_false(&perf_swevent_enabled[swevt]);
> }
>
> static inline void perf_event_task_migrate(struct task_struct *task)
> @@ -1207,11 +1201,9 @@ static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
> if (static_branch_unlikely(&perf_sched_events))
> __perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, task);
>
> - if (perf_sw_migrate_enabled() && task->sched_migrated) {
> - struct pt_regs *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&__perf_regs[0]);
> -
> - perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
> - ___perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS, 1, regs, 0);
> + if (__perf_sw_enabled(PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS) &&
> + task->sched_migrated) {
> + __perf_sw_event_sched(PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS, 1, 0);
> task->sched_migrated = 0;
> }
> }
> @@ -1219,7 +1211,13 @@ static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
> static inline void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
> struct task_struct *next)
> {
> - perf_sw_event_sched(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES, 1, 0);
> + if (__perf_sw_enabled(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES))
> + __perf_sw_event_sched(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES, 1, 0);
> +
> + if (__perf_sw_enabled(PERF_COUNT_SW_CGROUP_SWITCHES) &&
> + (task_css_check(prev, perf_event_cgrp_id, 1)->cgroup !=
> + task_css_check(next, perf_event_cgrp_id, 1)->cgroup))
> + __perf_sw_event_sched(PERF_COUNT_SW_CGROUP_SWITCHES, 1, 0);
Right, it needs to check only when the event is enabled.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> if (static_branch_unlikely(&perf_sched_events))
> __perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
> @@ -1475,8 +1473,6 @@ static inline int perf_event_refresh(struct perf_event *event, int refresh)
> static inline void
> perf_sw_event(u32 event_id, u64 nr, struct pt_regs *regs, u64 addr) { }
> static inline void
> -perf_sw_event_sched(u32 event_id, u64 nr, u64 addr) { }
> -static inline void
> perf_bp_event(struct perf_event *event, void *data) { }
>
> static inline int perf_register_guest_info_callbacks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists