[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160699174492.3364.14811197115462423469.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 10:35:44 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] seqlock: avoid -Wshadow warnings
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: a07c45312f06e288417049208c344ad76074627d
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/a07c45312f06e288417049208c344ad76074627d
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
AuthorDate: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 17:50:38 +01:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:20:50 +01:00
seqlock: avoid -Wshadow warnings
When building with W=2, there is a flood of warnings about the seqlock
macros shadowing local variables:
19806 linux/seqlock.h:331:11: warning: declaration of 'seq' shadows a previous local [-Wshadow]
48 linux/seqlock.h:348:11: warning: declaration of 'seq' shadows a previous local [-Wshadow]
8 linux/seqlock.h:379:11: warning: declaration of 'seq' shadows a previous local [-Wshadow]
Prefix the local variables to make the warning useful elsewhere again.
Fixes: 52ac39e5db51 ("seqlock: seqcount_t: Implement all read APIs as statement expressions")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201026165044.3722931-1-arnd@kernel.org
---
include/linux/seqlock.h | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index cbfc78b..8d85524 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -328,13 +328,13 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mu
*/
#define __read_seqcount_begin(s) \
({ \
- unsigned seq; \
+ unsigned __seq; \
\
- while ((seq = __seqcount_sequence(s)) & 1) \
+ while ((__seq = __seqcount_sequence(s)) & 1) \
cpu_relax(); \
\
kcsan_atomic_next(KCSAN_SEQLOCK_REGION_MAX); \
- seq; \
+ __seq; \
})
/**
@@ -345,10 +345,10 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mu
*/
#define raw_read_seqcount_begin(s) \
({ \
- unsigned seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s); \
+ unsigned _seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s); \
\
smp_rmb(); \
- seq; \
+ _seq; \
})
/**
@@ -376,11 +376,11 @@ SEQCOUNT_LOCKNAME(ww_mutex, struct ww_mutex, true, &s->lock->base, ww_mu
*/
#define raw_read_seqcount(s) \
({ \
- unsigned seq = __seqcount_sequence(s); \
+ unsigned __seq = __seqcount_sequence(s); \
\
smp_rmb(); \
kcsan_atomic_next(KCSAN_SEQLOCK_REGION_MAX); \
- seq; \
+ __seq; \
})
/**
Powered by blists - more mailing lists