linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mmots] checkpatch: add fix for non-standard signature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Dec 2020 17:53:43 +0530
From:   Aditya <yashsri421@...il.com>
To:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mmots] checkpatch: add fix for non-standard signature -
 co-authored-by

On 3/12/20 4:29 pm, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:59 AM Aditya <yashsri421@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/12/20 12:26 am, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 00:00 +0530, Aditya Srivastava wrote:
>>>> Currently, checkpatch.pl warns us for BAD_SIGN_OFF on the usage of
>>>> non-standard signatures.
>>>>
>>>> An evaluation on v4.13..v5.8 showed that out of 539 warnings due to
>>>> non-standard signatures, 43 are due to the use of 'Co-authored-by'
>>>> tag, which may seem correct, but is not standard.
>>>>
>>>> The standard signature equivalent for 'Co-authored-by' is
>>>> 'Co-developed-by'.
>>>
>>> I'm not going to ack this as I don't mind non-standard signatures.
>>>
>>
>> What do you suggest?
>> Should I drop this patch and move on?
>>
> 
> Joe does not ack this, but he also does not nack it.
> 
> You either move on (which is perfectly fine), or
> 
> you either wait that Andrew Morton reviews it and accepts it because
> he thinks it useful, or
> 
> you reach out to the git committers that have been using
> Co-authored-by in the past and ask them if this kind of feature would
> have been helpful for them and you get an ack from them that convinces
> Andrew Morton to pick this.
> 
> I hope this helps. If nobody thinks it is a useful feature, move on to
> work others acknowledge as useful. We have enough stuff to work on.
> 

Okay. I get it now. Thanks a lot Lukas :)

--
Aditya

> Lukas
>