lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 03 Dec 2020 13:54:15 +0100
From:   Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
        Chen Feng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] reset: hisilicon: correct vendor prefix

On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 20:02 +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> The vendor prefix of "Hisilicon Limited" is "hisilicon", it is clearly
> stated in "vendor-prefixes.yaml".
> 
> Fixes: 1527058736fa ("reset: hisilicon: add reset-hi3660")
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
> Cc: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/reset/hisilicon/reset-hi3660.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/hisilicon/reset-hi3660.c b/drivers/reset/hisilicon/reset-hi3660.c
> index a7d4445924e558c..8f1953159a65b31 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/hisilicon/reset-hi3660.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/hisilicon/reset-hi3660.c
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static int hi3660_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!rc)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	rc->map = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "hisi,rst-syscon");
> +	rc->map = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "hisilicon,rst-syscon");

What about those that don't upgrade kernel and DT in lock-step?
It would be easy to fall back to the old compatible if the new one
fails.

regards
Philipp

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ