[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Veh=b0JYOP_gETyqqGGEYhO9JcxFCGXSuzSX27-qioprA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 16:10:02 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Cc: linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Bogdan, Dragos" <dragos.bogdan@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] spi: Add SPI_NO_TX/RX support
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:00 PM Alexandru Ardelean
<alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> From: Dragos Bogdan <dragos.bogdan@...log.com>
>
> Transmit/receive only is a valid SPI mode. For example, the MOSI/TX line
> might be missing from an ADC while for a DAC the MISO/RX line may be
> optional. This patch adds these two new modes: SPI_NO_TX and
> SPI_NO_RX. This way, the drivers will be able to identify if any of
> these two lines is missing and to adjust the transfers accordingly.
...
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(SPI_MODE_USER_MASK & SPI_MODE_KERNEL_MASK);
Please, use static_assert() as I have been pointed out. It may be
located outside of a function scope. You may attach it directly to the
definition of the KERNEL_MASK (I haven't tried yet with header
though).
...
> +#define SPI_NO_TX BIT(31) /* no transmit wire */
> +#define SPI_NO_RX BIT(30) /* no receive wire */
> +#define SPI_MODE_KERNEL_MASK (SPI_NO_TX | SPI_NO_RX)
This needs a comment to explain what's going on with the flags (split).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists