[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201203150502.GC2830@gaia>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:05:03 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the arm64 tree
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 07:36:10AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/3/20 4:01 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 02:25:30PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> diff --cc arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> >> index 015beafe58f5,cdcf307764aa..000000000000
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> >> @@@ -63,7 -66,9 +63,8 @@@ void arch_release_task_struct(struct ta
> >> #define TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME 2 /* callback before returning to user */
> >> #define TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE 3 /* CPU's FP state is not current's */
> >> #define TIF_UPROBE 4 /* uprobe breakpoint or singlestep */
> >> - #define TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT 5 /* MTE Asynchronous Tag Check Fault */
> >> -#define TIF_FSCHECK 5 /* Check FS is USER_DS on return */
> >> ++#define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL 5 /* signal notifications exist */
> >> + #define TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT 6 /* MTE Asynchronous Tag Check Fault */
> >> -#define TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL 7 /* signal notifications exist */
> >> #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE 8 /* syscall trace active */
> >> #define TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT 9 /* syscall auditing */
> >> #define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT 10 /* syscall tracepoint for ftrace */
> >> @@@ -96,7 -103,8 +98,8 @@@
> >>
> >> #define _TIF_WORK_MASK (_TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_SIGPENDING | \
> >> _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE | \
> >> - _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT)
> >> - _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_FSCHECK | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT | \
> >> ++ _TIF_UPROBE | _TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT | \
> >> + _TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL)
> >
> > Thanks Stephen. It looks alright to me.
>
> Agree - I'll rebase my tree when -rc7 is out so we won't have this issue once
> the 5.11 merge window opens.
I don't think rebasing on -rc7 will help since the arm64 commit
b5a5a01d8e9a is queued for 5.11 (so not in -rc7).
It shouldn't matter much, Linus likes the occasional conflict ;).
Anyway, I can wait for your pull request to go in if you'd prefer (and
if it happens in the first week of the merging window).
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists