[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zh2tp4x2.fsf@stealth>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 07:44:41 +0900
From: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: wei.huang2@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add processor to the ignore PSD override list
Hi Rafael,
Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@...il.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> While looking into Giovanni's patches to enable frequency invariance
> on AMD systems[0], I noticed an issue with initialising frequency
> domain information on a recent AMD APU.
>
> Patch 1 refactors the test to ignore firmware provided frequency
> domain into a separate function.
>
> Patch 2 adds said APU (Family: 0x17, Model: 0x60, Stepping: 0x01) to
> the list of CPUs for which the PSD override is ignored. I am not quite
> happy with having to special case a particular CPU but also couldn't
> find any documentation to help identify the CPUs that don't need the
> override.
Are you be OK to pick the first two patches if there are no issues?
Thanks,
Punit
> Patch 3 and 4 are somewhat independent and a first step towards
> improving the situation with regards to the use of raw identifiers for
> AMD processors throughout the kernel.
>
> All feedback welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Punit
>
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20201112182614.10700-1-ggherdovich@suse.cz/
>
> Punit Agrawal (4):
> cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Re-factor overriding ACPI PSD
> cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Add processor to the ignore PSD override list
> x86/cpu: amd: Define processor families
> cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Use identifiers for AMD processor family
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/amd-family.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h | 2 ++
> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/amd-family.h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists