[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201204153855.13bafa83@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:38:55 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the jc_docs tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
Documentation/x86/index.rst
between commit:
ed13a92d0fde ("docs: archis: add a per-architecture features list")
from the jc_docs tree and commit:
3fa97bf00126 ("Documentation/x86: Document SGX kernel architecture")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc Documentation/x86/index.rst
index b4fcb6f258b2,e7eb84484ddc..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/x86/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/x86/index.rst
@@@ -33,4 -33,4 +33,5 @@@ x86-specific Documentatio
i386/index
x86_64/index
sva
+ sgx
+ features
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists