[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a58e3a7b-58bb-0430-2344-8e8155758e45@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 07:58:53 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Mychaela Falconia <mychaela.falconia@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Mychaela N . Falconia" <falcon@...ecalypso.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] tty: add flag to suppress ready signalling on open
On 02. 12. 20, 12:48, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> but I question the
>>> usefulness of doing so, as it is a chicken and egg problem: one needs
>>> to open the tty device in order to do termios ioctls on it, and if
>>> that initial open triggers DTR/RTS hardware actions, then the end user
>>> is still screwed. If Johan or someone else can see a potential use
>>> case for manipulating this new flag via termios (as opposed to sysfs
>>> or USB-ID-based driver quirks), perhaps you could elaborate on it?
>>
>> We would need to (ab)use another open flag (e.g. O_DIRECT). I am not
>> biased to either of solutions.
>
> Forgot to mention that using open-flags would prevent using standard
> utilities like cat, echo and terminal programs. So for that reason a
> termios and/or sysfs interface is also preferred.
Nope, I meant it differently. You set it up once using the special open
flag. Like with setserial, one sets I/O port, irqs etc. and then uses
standard tools as the port is already set up (marked as NORDY in this case).
thanks,
--
js
Powered by blists - more mailing lists