linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: ufs: Keep device power on only fWriteBoosterBufferFlushDuringHibernate == 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 04 Dec 2020 09:28:57 +0100
From:   Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To:     Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com,
        asutoshd@...eaurora.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
        beanhuo@...ron.com, bvanassche@....org, tomas.winkler@...el.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: ufs: Keep device power on only
 fWriteBoosterBufferFlushDuringHibernate == 1

On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 11:26 +0800, Can Guo wrote:
> > 
> >        if (!ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(hba))
> >                return false;
> > +
> > +     if (!hba->dev_info.is_hibern8_wb_flush)
> > +             return false;
> 
> The check is in the wrong place - even if say
> fWriteBoosterBufferFlushDuringHibernate is failed to be enabled,
> ufshcd_wb_need_flush() still needs to reflect the fact that whether
> the wb buffer needs to be flushed or not - it should not be decided
> by the flag.
> 
Can,
you are right, let me take it out from this function, and see if
acceptable.

Thanks,
Bean

> Thanks,
> 
> Can Guo.