[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <302cf18a-080d-a521-8c7a-39c265fbceb8@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:20:55 +0530
From: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Vivek Aknurwar <viveka@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeevan Shriram <jshriram@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] clk: qcom: gcc: Add clock driver for SM8350
Hi Vinod,
On 12/4/2020 10:05 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On 03-12-20, 18:06, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Thu 03 Dec 01:02 CST 2020, Vinod Koul wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8350.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8350.c
>> [..]
>>> +static int gcc_sm8350_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct regmap *regmap;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + regmap = qcom_cc_map(pdev, &gcc_sm8350_desc);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to map gcc registers\n");
>>> + return PTR_ERR(regmap);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ret = qcom_cc_register_rcg_dfs(regmap, gcc_dfs_clocks, ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_dfs_clocks));
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + /* FORCE_MEM_CORE_ON for ufs phy ice core clocks */
>>> + regmap_update_bits(regmap, gcc_ufs_phy_ice_core_clk.halt_reg, BIT(14), BIT(14));
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Enable clocks required by the i2c-connected pm8008 regulators. Don't
>>> + * register them with the clock framework so that client requests are
>>> + * short-circuited before grabbing the enable/prepare locks. This
>>> + * prevents deadlocks between the clk/regulator frameworks.
>>> + *
>>> + * gcc_qupv3_wrap_1_m_ahb_clk
>>> + * gcc_qupv3_wrap_1_s_ahb_clk
>>> + * gcc_qupv3_wrap1_s5_clk
>>> + */
>>
>> Isn't this a workaround inherited from the downstream control of
>> regulators from within the clock core? Does this still apply upstream?
>
> Let me check on this bit...
>
> Thanks
>
No it should not apply.
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists