linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: Mark some symbols with static keyword

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Dec 2020 09:56:23 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
Cc:     Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] pinctrl: pinctrl-microchip-sgpio: Mark some symbols
 with static keyword

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:31 PM Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com> wrote:

> Fix the following sparse warnings:
>
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c:63:31: warning: symbol 'properties_luton' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c:68:31: warning: symbol 'properties_ocelot' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-microchip-sgpio.c:73:31: warning: symbol 'properties_sparx5' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>

Patch applied, thanks Zou!

Yours,
Linus Walleij