[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+Px+wXi1eUf2xS0NB2-fnGi8G7h8ugiD4dPfW7ZPYRqC3uxzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 17:05:37 +0800
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Cheng-Yi Chiang <cychiang@...omium.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
ALSA development <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cros_ec_codec: fix uninitialized memory read
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:28 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:56 AM Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 6:55 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > In the case in i2s_rx_event(), only the "cmd" member is used. But it
> > is fine to please the compiler.
>
> I wouldn't do it just to please the compiler. I sent this patch since
> the code clearly copies the uninitialized data here. If only
> one byte is meant to be copied, then we should change the
> function call to not pass the entire structure. I'll send a new
> patch for that.
My sentence may confuse you. But I mean: the uninitialized data
doesn't introduce any bugs because it only uses the first byte in the
case.
Instead of your v2
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/alsa-devel/patch/20201204083624.2711356-1-arnd@kernel.org/),
I prefer this version v1.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists