[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98294.1607082708@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 11:51:48 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, lkp@...ts.01.org, lkp@...el.com,
ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...el.com,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iov_iter] 9bd0e337c6: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -4.8% regression
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com> wrote:
> FYI, we noticed a -4.8% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 9bd0e337c633aed3e8ec3c7397b7ae0b8436f163 ("[PATCH 01/29] iov_iter: Switch to using a table of operations")
Out of interest, would it be possible for you to run this on the tail of the
series on the same hardware?
Thanks,
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists