[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <113978.1607090965@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:09:25 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: =?UTF-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl=20Sala=C3=BCn?= <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
=?UTF-8?q?Micka=C3=ABl=20Sala=C3=BCn?=
<mic@...ux.microsoft.com>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] certs: Make blacklist_vet_description() more strict
Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net> wrote:
> + if (*desc)
> + /* The hash is greater than MAX_HASH_LEN. */
> + return -EINVAL;
-ENOPKG might be better. It's not that the string is invalid, it's just that
it's unsupported at the moment.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists