linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Use the new method of gpio CS control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 4 Dec 2020 17:00:58 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Akash Asthana <akashast@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Use the new method of gpio CS control

On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:13:52AM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:

> I am fine either way. I'm fine with pick all the patches and go through the
> chrome/platform tree if Mark is agree (I think this patch has no other
> dependencies and the patch applies cleanly to my tree) or all can go through the
> Mark's tree. If I need to an IB I can also do it without problems.
> 
> I'll leave Mark to decide who has much experience solving this kind of problems.

I'm happy to take both patches, there are some others in this area in
the SPI tree so it might minimise bisection problems if I take them but
not sure if there's any actual overlap there.  If someone could resend
them as a series?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)