linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 13/18] KVM: x86: Introduce new KVM_FEATURE_SEV_LIVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20201204170855.1131-1-Ashish.Kalra@amd.com>
Date:   Fri,  4 Dec 2020 17:08:55 +0000
From:   Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
To:     seanjc@...gle.com
Cc:     Ashish.Kalra@....com, Thomas.Lendacky@....com, bp@...e.de,
        brijesh.singh@....com, hpa@...or.com, joro@...tes.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
        srutherford@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        venu.busireddy@...cle.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/18] KVM: x86: Introduce new KVM_FEATURE_SEV_LIVE_MIGRATION feature & Custom MSR.

An immediate response, actually the SEV live migration patches are preferred over the Page encryption bitmap
patches, in other words, if SEV live migration patches are applied then we don't need the Page encryption bitmap
patches and we prefer the live migration series to be applied.

It is not that page encryption bitmap series supersede the live migration patches, they are just cut of the
live migration patches. 

Thanks,
Ashish