[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201205092227.7ea8d8af08c22ae219a8fbba@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 09:22:27 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] x86/insn: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop
over prefixes.bytes
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:02:21 +0100
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 07:55:09PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here are the 3rd version of patches to fix the wrong loop boundary
> > check on insn.prefixes.bytes[] array.
>
> Ok, so I've committed the version with ARRAY_SIZE to keep it as small
> as possible for stable. Let's discuss the new changes here ontop, once
> those urgent fixes go up.
Agreed. BTW, please fix to keep the #include "inat.h" for tools build.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists