linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 2/3] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with Protocol-based one

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201205135521.28344-3-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Date:   Sat, 5 Dec 2020 16:55:20 +0300
From:   Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
To:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        John Youn <John.Youn@...opsys.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] usb: dwc3: ulpi: Replace CPU-based busyloop with Protocol-based one

Originally the procedure of the ULPI transaction finish detection has been
developed as a simple busy-loop with just decrementing counter and no
delays. It's wrong since on different systems the loop will take a
different time to complete. So if the system bus and CPU are fast enough
to overtake the ULPI bus and the companion PHY reaction, then we'll get to
take a false timeout error. Fix this by converting the busy-loop procedure
to take the standard bus speed, address value and the registers access
mode into account for the busy-loop delay calculation.

Here is the way the fix works. It's known that the ULPI bus is clocked
with 60MHz signal. In accordance with [1] the ULPI bus protocol is created
so to spend 5 and 6 clock periods for immediate register write and read
operations respectively, and 6 and 7 clock periods - for the extended
register writes and reads. Based on that we can easily pre-calculate the
time which will be needed for the controller to perform a requested IO
operation. Note we'll still preserve the attempts counter in case if the
DWC USB3 controller has got some internals delays.

[1] UTMI+ Low Pin Interface (ULPI) Specification, Revision 1.1,
    October 20, 2004, pp. 30 - 36.

Fixes: 88bc9d194ff6 ("usb: dwc3: add ULPI interface support")
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
index 3cc4f4970c05..54c877f7b51d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ulpi.c
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
  * Author: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
  */
 
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/time64.h>
 #include <linux/ulpi/regs.h>
 
 #include "core.h"
@@ -17,12 +19,22 @@
 		DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(ULPI_ACCESS_EXTENDED) | \
 		DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_EXTEND_ADDR(a) : DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_ADDR(a))
 
-static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc)
+#define DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY	DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, 60000000L)
+
+static int dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(struct dwc3 *dwc, u8 addr, bool read)
 {
+	unsigned long ns = 5L * DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY;
 	unsigned int count = 1000;
 	u32 reg;
 
+	if (addr >= ULPI_EXT_VENDOR_SPECIFIC)
+		ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY;
+
+	if (read)
+		ns += DWC3_ULPI_BASE_DELAY;
+
 	while (count--) {
+		ndelay(ns);
 		reg = dwc3_readl(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0));
 		if (reg & DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_DONE)
 			return 0;
@@ -47,7 +59,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_read(struct device *dev, u8 addr)
 	reg = DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_NEWREGREQ | DWC3_ULPI_ADDR(addr);
 	dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg);
 
-	ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc);
+	ret = dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, true);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -71,7 +83,7 @@ static int dwc3_ulpi_write(struct device *dev, u8 addr, u8 val)
 	reg |= DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC_WRITE | val;
 	dwc3_writel(dwc->regs, DWC3_GUSB2PHYACC(0), reg);
 
-	return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc);
+	return dwc3_ulpi_busyloop(dwc, addr, false);
 }
 
 static const struct ulpi_ops dwc3_ulpi_ops = {
-- 
2.29.2