[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20201205191744.7847-13-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 20:17:35 +0100
From: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
To: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: factor out parsing of {rx,tx}-clock{,-name} properties
Reduce the code duplication a bit by moving the parsing of
rx-clock-name and the fallback handling to a helper function.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth.c | 79 ++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth.c
index ba911d05d36d..700eafef4921 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth.c
@@ -3646,6 +3646,35 @@ static const struct net_device_ops ucc_geth_netdev_ops = {
#endif
};
+static int ucc_geth_parse_clock(struct device_node *np, const char *which,
+ enum qe_clock *out)
+{
+ const char *sprop;
+ char buf[24];
+
+ snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s-clock-name", which);
+ sprop = of_get_property(np, buf, NULL);
+ if (sprop) {
+ *out = qe_clock_source(sprop);
+ } else {
+ u32 val;
+
+ snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s-clock", which);
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, buf, &val)) {
+ /* If both *-clock-name and *-clock are missing,
+ we want to tell people to use *-clock-name. */
+ pr_err("missing %s-name property\n", buf);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ *out = val;
+ }
+ if (*out < QE_CLK_NONE || *out > QE_CLK24) {
+ pr_err("invalid %s property\n", buf);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int ucc_geth_probe(struct platform_device* ofdev)
{
struct device *device = &ofdev->dev;
@@ -3656,7 +3685,6 @@ static int ucc_geth_probe(struct platform_device* ofdev)
struct resource res;
int err, ucc_num, max_speed = 0;
const unsigned int *prop;
- const char *sprop;
const void *mac_addr;
phy_interface_t phy_interface;
static const int enet_to_speed[] = {
@@ -3695,49 +3723,12 @@ static int ucc_geth_probe(struct platform_device* ofdev)
ug_info->uf_info.ucc_num = ucc_num;
- sprop = of_get_property(np, "rx-clock-name", NULL);
- if (sprop) {
- ug_info->uf_info.rx_clock = qe_clock_source(sprop);
- if ((ug_info->uf_info.rx_clock < QE_CLK_NONE) ||
- (ug_info->uf_info.rx_clock > QE_CLK24)) {
- pr_err("invalid rx-clock-name property\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- } else {
- prop = of_get_property(np, "rx-clock", NULL);
- if (!prop) {
- /* If both rx-clock-name and rx-clock are missing,
- we want to tell people to use rx-clock-name. */
- pr_err("missing rx-clock-name property\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- if ((*prop < QE_CLK_NONE) || (*prop > QE_CLK24)) {
- pr_err("invalid rx-clock property\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- ug_info->uf_info.rx_clock = *prop;
- }
-
- sprop = of_get_property(np, "tx-clock-name", NULL);
- if (sprop) {
- ug_info->uf_info.tx_clock = qe_clock_source(sprop);
- if ((ug_info->uf_info.tx_clock < QE_CLK_NONE) ||
- (ug_info->uf_info.tx_clock > QE_CLK24)) {
- pr_err("invalid tx-clock-name property\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- } else {
- prop = of_get_property(np, "tx-clock", NULL);
- if (!prop) {
- pr_err("missing tx-clock-name property\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- if ((*prop < QE_CLK_NONE) || (*prop > QE_CLK24)) {
- pr_err("invalid tx-clock property\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- ug_info->uf_info.tx_clock = *prop;
- }
+ err = ucc_geth_parse_clock(np, "rx", &ug_info->uf_info.rx_clock);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ err = ucc_geth_parse_clock(np, "tx", &ug_info->uf_info.tx_clock);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
err = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res);
if (err)
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists