[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201205204301.GB8578@amd>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 21:43:01 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32
systems
On Tue 2020-11-24 15:50:25, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Here's version four of the wonderful patches I previously posted here:
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201027215118.27003-1-will@kernel.org
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109213023.15092-1-will@kernel.org
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113093720.21106-1-will@kernel.org
>
> and which started life as a reimplementation of some patches from Qais:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201021104611.2744565-1-qais.yousef@arm.com
>
> The aim of this series is to allow 32-bit ARM applications to run on
> arm64 SoCs where not all of the CPUs support the 32-bit instruction set.
> Unfortunately, such SoCs are real and will continue to be productised
> over the next few years at least.
Out of curiosity, what systems are that?
Is the 32-bit available on the big or on the little cores?
And... fun way to accelerate demise of arm32 :-).
Best regards,
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists