[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201205132716.4c68e35d@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 13:27:16 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
Cc: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] ethernet: ucc_geth: assorted fixes and
simplifications
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 22:11:39 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > Looks like a nice clean up on a quick look.
> >
> > Please separate patches 1 and 11 (which are the two bug fixes I see)
>
> I think patch 2 is a bug fix as well, but I'd like someone from NXP to
> comment.
Sure, makes sense.
> > rebase (retest) and post them against the net tree:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/
>
> So I thought this would go through Li Yang's tree. That's where my
> previous QE related patches have gone through, and at least some need
> some input from NXP folks - and what MAINTAINERS suggests. So not
> marking the patches with net or net-next was deliberate. But I'm happy
> to rearrange and send to net/net-next as appropriate if that's what you
> and Li Yang can agree to.
Ah, now I noticed you didn't CC all of the patches to netdev.
Please don't do that, build bots won't be able to validate partially
posted patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists