| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20201205013103.eo5chfx57kf25pz3@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 17:31:03 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
CC: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...zon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
<osa-contribution-log@...zon.com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 01/11] tcp: Keep TCP_CLOSE sockets in the
reuseport group.
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 11:44:08PM +0900, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> This patch is a preparation patch to migrate incoming connections in the
> later commits and adds a field (num_closed_socks) to the struct
> sock_reuseport to keep TCP_CLOSE sockets in the reuseport group.
>
> When we close a listening socket, to migrate its connections to another
> listener in the same reuseport group, we have to handle two kinds of child
> sockets. One is that a listening socket has a reference to, and the other
> is not.
>
> The former is the TCP_ESTABLISHED/TCP_SYN_RECV sockets, and they are in the
> accept queue of their listening socket. So, we can pop them out and push
> them into another listener's queue at close() or shutdown() syscalls. On
> the other hand, the latter, the TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV socket is during the
> three-way handshake and not in the accept queue. Thus, we cannot access
> such sockets at close() or shutdown() syscalls. Accordingly, we have to
> migrate immature sockets after their listening socket has been closed.
>
> Currently, if their listening socket has been closed, TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV
> sockets are freed at receiving the final ACK or retransmitting SYN+ACKs. At
> that time, if we could select a new listener from the same reuseport group,
> no connection would be aborted. However, it is impossible because
> reuseport_detach_sock() sets NULL to sk_reuseport_cb and forbids access to
> the reuseport group from closed sockets.
>
> This patch allows TCP_CLOSE sockets to remain in the reuseport group and to
> have access to it while any child socket references to them. The point is
> that reuseport_detach_sock() is called twice from inet_unhash() and
> sk_destruct(). At first, it moves the socket backwards in socks[] and
> increments num_closed_socks. Later, when all migrated connections are
> accepted, it removes the socket from socks[], decrements num_closed_socks,
> and sets NULL to sk_reuseport_cb.
>
> By this change, closed sockets can keep sk_reuseport_cb until all child
> requests have been freed or accepted. Consequently calling listen() after
> shutdown() can cause EADDRINUSE or EBUSY in reuseport_add_sock() or
> inet_csk_bind_conflict() which expect that such sockets should not have the
> reuseport group. Therefore, this patch also loosens such validation rules
> so that the socket can listen again if it has the same reuseport group with
> other listening sockets.
>
> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...zon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
> ---
> include/net/sock_reuseport.h | 5 ++-
> net/core/sock_reuseport.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 7 ++-
> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sock_reuseport.h b/include/net/sock_reuseport.h
> index 505f1e18e9bf..0e558ca7afbf 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock_reuseport.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock_reuseport.h
> @@ -13,8 +13,9 @@ extern spinlock_t reuseport_lock;
> struct sock_reuseport {
> struct rcu_head rcu;
>
> - u16 max_socks; /* length of socks */
> - u16 num_socks; /* elements in socks */
> + u16 max_socks; /* length of socks */
> + u16 num_socks; /* elements in socks */
> + u16 num_closed_socks; /* closed elements in socks */
> /* The last synq overflow event timestamp of this
> * reuse->socks[] group.
> */
> diff --git a/net/core/sock_reuseport.c b/net/core/sock_reuseport.c
> index bbdd3c7b6cb5..fd133516ac0e 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock_reuseport.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock_reuseport.c
> @@ -98,16 +98,21 @@ static struct sock_reuseport *reuseport_grow(struct sock_reuseport *reuse)
> return NULL;
>
> more_reuse->num_socks = reuse->num_socks;
> + more_reuse->num_closed_socks = reuse->num_closed_socks;
> more_reuse->prog = reuse->prog;
> more_reuse->reuseport_id = reuse->reuseport_id;
> more_reuse->bind_inany = reuse->bind_inany;
> more_reuse->has_conns = reuse->has_conns;
> + more_reuse->synq_overflow_ts = READ_ONCE(reuse->synq_overflow_ts);
>
> memcpy(more_reuse->socks, reuse->socks,
> reuse->num_socks * sizeof(struct sock *));
> - more_reuse->synq_overflow_ts = READ_ONCE(reuse->synq_overflow_ts);
> + memcpy(more_reuse->socks +
> + (more_reuse->max_socks - more_reuse->num_closed_socks),
> + reuse->socks + reuse->num_socks,
> + reuse->num_closed_socks * sizeof(struct sock *));
>
> - for (i = 0; i < reuse->num_socks; ++i)
> + for (i = 0; i < reuse->max_socks; ++i)
> rcu_assign_pointer(reuse->socks[i]->sk_reuseport_cb,
> more_reuse);
>
> @@ -129,6 +134,25 @@ static void reuseport_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> kfree(reuse);
> }
>
> +static int reuseport_sock_index(struct sock_reuseport *reuse, struct sock *sk,
> + bool closed)
> +{
> + int left, right;
> +
> + if (!closed) {
> + left = 0;
> + right = reuse->num_socks;
> + } else {
> + left = reuse->max_socks - reuse->num_closed_socks;
> + right = reuse->max_socks;
> + }
> +
> + for (; left < right; left++)
> + if (reuse->socks[left] == sk)
> + return left;
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * reuseport_add_sock - Add a socket to the reuseport group of another.
> * @sk: New socket to add to the group.
> @@ -153,12 +177,23 @@ int reuseport_add_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sock *sk2, bool bind_inany)
> lockdep_is_held(&reuseport_lock));
> old_reuse = rcu_dereference_protected(sk->sk_reuseport_cb,
> lockdep_is_held(&reuseport_lock));
> - if (old_reuse && old_reuse->num_socks != 1) {
> +
> + if (old_reuse == reuse) {
> + int i = reuseport_sock_index(reuse, sk, true);
> +
> + if (i == -1) {
When will this happen?
I found the new logic in the closed sk shuffling within socks[] quite
complicated to read. I can see why the closed sk wants to keep its
sk->sk_reuseport_cb. However, does it need to stay
in socks[]?
> + spin_unlock_bh(&reuseport_lock);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + reuse->socks[i] = reuse->socks[reuse->max_socks - reuse->num_closed_socks];
> + reuse->num_closed_socks--;
> + } else if (old_reuse && old_reuse->num_socks != 1) {
> spin_unlock_bh(&reuseport_lock);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> - if (reuse->num_socks == reuse->max_socks) {
> + if (reuse->num_socks + reuse->num_closed_socks == reuse->max_socks) {
> reuse = reuseport_grow(reuse);
> if (!reuse) {
> spin_unlock_bh(&reuseport_lock);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists