[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201205154951.4dd92194@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 15:49:51 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: "Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Sasha Netfin <sasha.neftin@...el.com>,
Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>,
Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Arcari <darcari@...hat.com>,
"Shen, Yijun" <Yijun.Shen@...l.com>,
"Yuan, Perry" <Perry.Yuan@...l.com>,
"anthony.wong@...onical.com" <anthony.wong@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:38:03 -0800 Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > > The patches look good to me. Just need to address the minor issue that
> > > seems to have been present prior to the introduction of this patch
> > > set.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
> >
> > Thanks for your review. Just some operational questions - since this previously
> > existed do you want me to re-spin the series to a v4 for this, or should it be
> > a follow up after the series?
> >
> > If I respin it, would you prefer that change to occur at the start or end
> > of the series?
>
> I don't need a respin, but if you are going to fix it you should
> probably put out the patch as something like a 8/7. If you respin it
> should happen near the start of the series as it is a bug you are
> addressing.
Don't we need that patch to be before this series so it can be
back ported easily? Or is it not really a bug?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists