[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM7-yPSpqCUEJqJW+hzz9ccJbU5OnOZj1Vpyi8d5LG5=QbCTjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2020 17:45:14 +0900
From: Yun Levi <ppbuk5246@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, rdunlap@...radead.org,
masahiroy@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
peter.enderborg@...y.com, krzk@...nel.org,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, broonie@...nel.org,
matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
jpa@....mail.kapsi.fi, nivedita@...m.mit.edu,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, orson.zhai@...soc.com,
Takahiro Akashi <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>, clm@...com,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, dsterba@...e.com,
dushistov@...l.ru,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] lib/find_bit.c: Add find_last_zero_bit
Sorry, in 7'th patch (not 8th).
Thanks
Levi.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 5:31 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 03:46:24PM +0900, Levi Yun wrote:
> > Inspired find_next_*_bit and find_last_bit, add find_last_zero_bit
> > And add le support about find_last_bit and find_last_zero_bit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Levi Yun <ppbuk5246@...il.com>
> > ---
> > lib/find_bit.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/find_bit.c b/lib/find_bit.c
> > index 4a8751010d59..f9dda2bf7fa9 100644
> > --- a/lib/find_bit.c
> > +++ b/lib/find_bit.c
> > @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ unsigned long find_next_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size,
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_next_zero_bit);
> > #endif
> >
> > -#if !defined(find_next_and_bit)
> > +#ifndef find_next_and_bit
> > unsigned long find_next_and_bit(const unsigned long *addr1,
> > const unsigned long *addr2, unsigned long size,
> > unsigned long offset)
> > @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ unsigned long find_last_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size)
> > {
> > if (size) {
> > unsigned long val = BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(size);
> > - unsigned long idx = (size-1) / BITS_PER_LONG;
> > + unsigned long idx = (size - 1) / BITS_PER_LONG;
> >
> > do {
> > val &= addr[idx];
>
> This, and the change above this, are not related to this patch so you
> might not want to include them.
>
> Also, why is this patch series even needed? I don't see a justification
> for it anywhere, only "what" this patch is, not "why".
>
> thanks
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists