lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X8yd/Em7ZQv7I32a@kroah.com>
Date:   Sun, 6 Dec 2020 10:01:48 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Yun Levi <ppbuk5246@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, rdunlap@...radead.org,
        masahiroy@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        peter.enderborg@...y.com, krzk@...nel.org,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, broonie@...nel.org,
        matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        jpa@....mail.kapsi.fi, nivedita@...m.mit.edu,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, orson.zhai@...soc.com,
        Takahiro Akashi <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>, clm@...com,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, dsterba@...e.com,
        dushistov@...l.ru,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] lib/find_bit.c: Add find_last_zero_bit

On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 05:56:30PM +0900, Yun Levi wrote:
> > This, and the change above this, are not related to this patch so you
> > might not want to include them.
> 
> > Also, why is this patch series even needed?  I don't see a justification
> > for it anywhere, only "what" this patch is, not "why".
> 
> I think the find_last_zero_bit will help to improve in
> 7th patch's change and It can be used in the future.
> But if my thinking is bad.. Please let me know..

You need to explain that in a 0/8 patch.  But note that this seems like
a lot of work just for one tiny user, what is the real benifit here?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ